Crash of a Yakovlev Yak-40 in Chita

Date & Time: Apr 18, 1986
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
CCCP-87301
Survivors:
Yes
MSN:
9 32 17 28
YOM:
1973
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
5
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
27
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
0
Circumstances:
Upon landing at Chita-Kadala Airport, the right main landing gear collapsed. This caused the right wing to struck the ground and the aircraft slid several yards then veered off runway to the right and came to rest. While all 32 occupants were uninjured, the aircraft was damaged beyond repair.
Probable cause:
The right main landing gear collapsed upon landing after the kingpin arm of the folding brace mount failed due to manufacturing defect.

Crash of a PZL-Mielec AN-2 near Frunze

Date & Time: Apr 8, 1986
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
CCCP-56375
Flight Phase:
MSN:
1G180-54
YOM:
1978
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
0
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
0
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
0
Circumstances:
Crashed in unknown circumstances near Frunze after the crew failed to follow the minimum safe altitude. Occupant fate unknown.

Crash of a Boeing 727-264 on Mt San Andrés: 167 killed

Date & Time: Mar 31, 1986 at 0911 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
XA-MEM
Flight Phase:
Survivors:
No
Site:
Schedule:
Mexico City – Puerto Vallarta – Mazatlán – Los Angeles
MSN:
22414
YOM:
1981
Flight number:
MX940
Country:
Crew on board:
8
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
159
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
167
Captain / Total flying hours:
15000
Circumstances:
The three engine aircraft departed Mexico City-Benito Juárez Airport at 0840LT on a regular schedule service to Los Angeles with two intermediate stops in Puerto Vallarta and Mazatlán, carrying 159 passengers and a crew of eight. While cruising at the assigned altitude of 31,000 feet, an explosion occurred on the left main gear wheel well after a tire burst. Fuel and hydraulic lines were ruptured and electrical cables severed, causing a cabin decompression. The captain declared an emergency and elected to reduce his altitude when the aircraft caught fire after fuel ignited. The aircraft entered an uncontrolled descent and crashed on the slope of Mt San Andrés (3,569 meters high) located 18 km southwest of Maravatio, State of Michoacán. The aircraft disintegrated on impact and all 167 occupants were killed.
Probable cause:
It was determined that the left main gear brake was overheated during the takeoff run. This allowed a tire to explode due to high temperature and pressure because it has been serviced with air rather than nitrogen.

Crash of a Casa 212 Aviocar 100 in Naha: 2 killed

Date & Time: Mar 20, 1986
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
PK-NCF
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Manado - Naha
MSN:
108/15N
YOM:
1979
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
2
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
14
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
2
Circumstances:
On approach to Naha Airport, the crew encountered limited visibility due to low clouds and rain falls. On final, the pilot failed to realize his altitude was insufficient when the aircraft struck trees and crashed on a wooded and hilly terrain located few km from the airport. All 14 passengers were injured while both pilots were killed.

Crash of an Embraer EMB-110P1 Bandeirante in Alpena: 3 killed

Date & Time: Mar 13, 1986 at 2200 LT
Operator:
Registration:
N1356P
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Detroit - Alpena - Saulte Sainte Marie
MSN:
110-370
YOM:
1981
Flight number:
MQ1746
Crew on board:
2
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
7
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
3
Captain / Total flying hours:
3384
Captain / Total hours on type:
574.00
Copilot / Total flying hours:
6271
Copilot / Total hours on type:
21
Aircraft flight hours:
9698
Aircraft flight cycles:
16767
Circumstances:
About 2050 on March 13, 1986, Simmons Airlines flight 1746, an Embraer Bandeirante, EMB-110P1, operating as a regularly scheduled flight, departed the Detroit Metropolitan Airport en route to Sault Ste Marie, Michigan, with a stop in Alpena, Michigan. The en route portion of the flight to Alpena was uneventful. However, due to the prevailing instrument meteorological conditions, the crew was unable to complete the instrument landing system (ILS) approach and land and they declared a missed approach at 2142. At 2153, the flight was cleared for a second ILS approach to Alpena. At 2156, the crew acknowledged that radar services were being terminated. This was the last transmission from the airplane. About 2215, a motorist reported that the airplane had
crashed. The airplane was found in a wooded area about 300 feet to the left of the extended centerline, and 1 1/2 miles short of the threshold of runway 01 at Alpena. The airplane was destroyed and two of the seven passengers and one of the two crewmembers onboard were killed.
Probable cause:
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the flightcrew’s continued descent of the airplane below the glideslope and through the published decision height without obtaining visual reference of the runway for undetermined reasons. Contributing to the accident was the inefficient system used to disseminate weather-related information to the crew.
Final Report:

Crash of an Antonov AN-24B in Bugulma: 38 killed

Date & Time: Mar 2, 1986 at 0304 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
CCCP-46423
Survivors:
No
Schedule:
Moscow - Cheboksary - Bugulma
MSN:
0 73 041 08
YOM:
1970
Flight number:
SU77F
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
4
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
34
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
38
Aircraft flight hours:
31570
Aircraft flight cycles:
23765
Circumstances:
On approach to Bugulma Airport by night, the left propeller autofeathered. The aircraft speed dropped and the aircraft started to veer to the left. The crew elected to maintain directional control but the speed continued to drop. At a speed of 140 km/h, the aircraft banked left to an angle of 110° then stalled and crashed in a field located 8 km from the runway threshold and 500 meters from its extended centerline. The aircraft was totally destroyed and all 38 occupants were killed.
Probable cause:
The left propeller autofeathered one second after the flaps were deployed in an angle of 38° because an electrical switch connected to the automatic feathering system failed. This situation affected the aircraft stability and controllability and the crew was unable to correct abnormal yaw and roll following several errors.

Crash of a Douglas DC-9-31 in Erie

Date & Time: Feb 21, 1986 at 0859 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
N961VJ
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Toronto - Erie
MSN:
47506
YOM:
1970
Flight number:
US499
Crew on board:
5
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
18
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
0
Captain / Total flying hours:
8900
Captain / Total hours on type:
5900.00
Aircraft flight hours:
42104
Circumstances:
During arrival, the crew of USAir flight 499 landed on runway 24, which was covered with snow. Reportedly, while landing, the aircraft touched down approximately 1,800 to 2,000 feet beyond the displaced threshold. Altho armed, the spoilers did not autodeploy, so the captain operated them manually. He lowered the aircraft's nose, actuated reverse thrust and applied brakes. The brakes were not effective. Subsequently, the aircraft continued off the end of the runway, ran over a runway end id light, struck a fence and came to rest straddling a road. The crew had planned on making an ILS approach to runway 06, but the RVR was only 2,800 feet and a minimum RVR of 4 000 feet was requested for that runway. The crew elected to land on runway 24, since 1/2 mile visibility was sufficient for that runway. However, the approach was made with a qtrg tailwind and approximately 10 knots above Vref. Tailwind landings were not authorized on runway 24 in wet/slippery conditions. The runway braking action was reported as fair-to-poor. The pilot's handbook cautioned the crew to monitor the spoilers when landing on slippery runways, since the spoilers auto-deploy only with wheel spin-up or when the nose wheel is on the ground. A passenger was slightly injured while 22 other occupants were uninjured.
Probable cause:
Occurrence #1: overrun
Phase of operation: landing - roll
Findings
1. (f) weather condition - low ceiling
2. (f) weather condition - snow
3. (f) weather condition - fog
4. (f) weather condition - tailwind
5. (c) planning/decision - improper - pilot in command
6. (f) airspeed(vref) - exceeded - pilot in command
7. (f) airport facilities, runway/landing area condition - displaced threshold
8. (f) proper touchdown point - not attained - pilot in command
9. (f) airport facilities, runway/landing area condition - snow covered
10. (c) go-around - not performed - pilot in command
----------
Occurrence #2: on ground/water collision with object
Phase of operation: landing - roll
Findings
11. (f) object - runway light
12. (f) object - fence
----------
Occurrence #3: on ground/water encounter with terrain/water
Phase of operation: landing - roll
Findings
13. (f) terrain condition - rough/uneven
Final Report:

Crash of a Boeing 737-281 off Magong: 13 killed

Date & Time: Feb 16, 1986 at 1850 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
B-1870
Survivors:
No
Schedule:
Kaohsiung - Magong
MSN:
20226
YOM:
1969
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
7
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
6
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
13
Circumstances:
On final approach to Magong Airport by night, the crew apparently encountered problems with the nose gear. The captain decided to initiate a go-around procedure. Few minutes later, while climbing, the airplane entered an uncontrolled descent and crashed in the sea. On March 10, the wreckage was found in a depth of 58 meters about 19 km north of the airport. All 13 occupants were killed.

Crash of a Lockheed L-188AF Electra near Kasongo-Lunda: 2 killed

Date & Time: Feb 5, 1986
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
9Q-CWT
Flight Phase:
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Kasongo-Lunda – Kinshasa
MSN:
1045
YOM:
1959
Region:
Crew on board:
4
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
10
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
2
Circumstances:
Few minutes after takeoff from Kasongo-Lunda, en route to Kinshasa, the crew encountered engine problems. He completed an emergency landing in the bush about 80 km north of Kasongo-Lunda. The aircraft crash landed and was damaged beyond repair. Two passengers were killed while 12 other occupants were injured.

Crash of a Short 360-100 in East Midlands

Date & Time: Jan 31, 1986 at 1851 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
EI-BEM
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Dublin - East Midlands
MSN:
3642
YOM:
1984
Flight number:
EI328
Region:
Crew on board:
3
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
33
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
0
Captain / Total flying hours:
7528
Captain / Total hours on type:
123.00
Copilot / Total flying hours:
4299
Copilot / Total hours on type:
1240
Aircraft flight hours:
3226
Circumstances:
The Shorts 360 aircraft was scheduled to fly from Dublin (DUB) to East Midlands Airport (EMA) as Aer Lingus flight 328. During the pre-flight briefing the crew learned that at East Midlands the precision radar was unserviceable and that, although the visual approach slope indicators (VASI) had been withdrawn, the precision approach path indicators (PAPI) were operational. The en-route weather was reported as being overcast for the whole journey, with cloud tops at FL70 and a probability of icing when flying in the cloud. There had also been a pilot's report of severe icing between FL30 and FL70 in the Birmingham area, some 30 nm south-west of East Midlands Airport. The terminal area forecast for East Midlands suggested a brisk north-easterly wind and a cloud base of 1200 feet. The aircraft took off at 17:25. The crew report that they exercised the wing and tail de-icing system during the climb to FL 90, the level which had been assigned for the flight, and that at that level they were above the layers of stratiform cloud. Following an uneventful flight, via Wallasey, to the NDB at Whitegate, they were taken under radar control directly towards the airport and given descent clearance, eventually to 3000 feet, to intercept the ILS approach path for runway 09. During the descent and before entering the cloud tops at about FL60, the crew switched on the aircraft's anti-ice system, which heats the windscreen, engine air intakes, propellers, static air vents and pitot probes but, in accordance with normal operating procedure, they did not use the wing and tail de-icing system. At this time, the freezing level (0°C isotherm) was at 1000 feet, the temperature at FL 60 was minus 6°C and the air was saturated. Whilst in the cloud, which according to the non-handling pilot was particularly dense, ice thrown from the propellers was heard striking the side of the aircraft fuselage, and it was suggested that the propeller rpm be increased to expedite the removal of the ice. Both pilots state that, at some time during the descent, they visually checked the aircraft for ice but saw none. Nevertheless, several other flights during that evening have since reported the occurrence of severe icing. Having levelled at 3000 feet, still in and out of cloud, the aircraft was directed by radar to intercept the ILS and was fully established on the glideslope and centreline by 10 nm, at which point the final descent was initiated. A normal approach was established and continued, past the outer marker beacon situated at 3.9 nm from touchdown, down to around 1000 feet above the runway threshold height. The crew state that up to this point they had neither experienced any significant turbulence nor observed any ice forming on the aircraft. The last meteorological information passed to the crew gave the wind as 060 degrees /15 kt, however, over the previous hour the wind speed in the area, although not automatically recorded at the airport, is reported as gusting up to 30 kt. As the aircraft descended through about 1000 feet, it suddenly rolled very sharply to the left without apparent cause. With the application of corrective aileron and rudder the aircraft rolled rapidly right, well beyond the wings level position. This alternate left and right rolling motion continued with the angles of bank increasing for some 30 seconds, causing the commander to believe that the aircraft might roll right over onto its back. The angles of bank then gradually decreased. During this period and the subsequent few seconds the aircraft established a very high descent rate approaching 3000 feet/min. Subsequently, with the aid of full engine power, the airspeed increased and the rate of descent was arrested just as the aircraft struck an 11 KV power cable. It continued through another similar cable, two of the supporting wooden poles and the tops of two trees, before coming to rest nose into a small wood edging a field of barley, some 460 metres from the impact with the first power cable. The cockpit and passenger cabin were relatively undamaged and there was no fire. The aircraft came to rest lying virtually upright and the passengers, and subsequently the crew, successfully evacuated from the front and rear emergency exits.
Probable cause:
The accident most probably occurred as a result of the effects of a significant accumulation of airframe ice degrading the aircraft's stability and control characteristics, such that the crew were unable to maintain control. Turbulence and or downdraught may have contributed to the accident. Other contributory factors were the difficulty in detecting clear ice at night on the SD3-60 which resulted in the airframe de-icing system not being used. The delay in application of go-around power may have also contributed to the accident.
Final Report: