Country
code

Nord-Trøndelag

Crash of an Extra EA-400 in Rørvik

Date & Time: Sep 2, 2001 at 1050 LT
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
D-ETAW
Flight Phase:
Flight Type:
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Rørvik - Nuremberg
MSN:
08
YOM:
2000
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
1
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
2
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
0
Captain / Total flying hours:
705
Captain / Total hours on type:
50.00
Aircraft flight hours:
248
Aircraft flight cycles:
215
Circumstances:
The pilot went through the checklist “BEFORE STARTING ENGINE CHECKLIST” and then started the engine. Everything was normal and, after going through the subsequent points on the checklist, he taxied out to the end of runway 04 where he performed the “BEFORE TAKEOFF CHECK”. In the position at the end of the runway, an engine check was carried out. All was set at 10:50 hrs. As the accident happened outside opening hours, the Airport was unmanned and no AFIS or recovery services were available. The pilot held the aircraft back on brakes and gave “full power”. All indications were normal, according to the pilot. All the instruments indicated “high power”. He released the brakes and checked the acceleration. At 50% of the runway’s length, the passenger in the right front seat called an airspeed of 60 kts IAS, and at 75% of the runway, the pilot rotated the aircraft. At that point the speed was 78 kts. The pilot estimates that the aircraft had gained a height of approx. 25 m when he experienced a loss of power (“leistungsverlust”), which he thought was related to a loss of turbo power, shortly after the stall warning light came on. The pilot realized that it was impossible to continue the flight, so he attempted to land on the remaining runway. 150 m of the runway still remained, and the aircraft landed hard at a steep angle on the runway. The aircraft hit the runway hard on the main wheels and the tail. When the pilot realized that it would be difficult to stop on the remaining portion of the runway, he retracted the landing gear. The aircraft continued past the end of the runway, where it hit several large rocks along the breakwater, where the approach lights for runway 04 are positioned. Following hitting the rocks, the pilot registered fire in the engine, which was quickly extinguished when the aircraft entered the water along the breakwater. The left wing hit so hard into the breakwater that the aircraft rotated 180° and stopped in the opposite direction of the take-off. The aircraft half filled with water immediately. The passengers and pilot unfastened their seat belts and evacuated through the emergency hatch on the right-hand side of the aircraft. The passenger seated in the cabin received only minor injuries during the evacuation, mainly caused by the jagged rocks.
Probable cause:
The AAIB/N’s investigations, in cooperation with an expert from the engine manufacturer, conclude that the experienced loss of engine power was caused by the grounding of one of the magnetos as a result of fire. The fire started when fuel began to leak from the fuel manifold valve and from there sprayed out over the engine’s crank casing, wires, pipes etc. Thereafter it is most probable that alternator no. 2 ignited the fuel. The fire spread rapidly and the insulation around the first magneto and subsequently the second were destroyed with the result that they became permanently connected to ground. This first led to the engine losing power and then failing altogether. The blue staining of the crankcase’s top and the presence of yellow putty indicate that this loose connection dates from the time after the engine’s shock loading inspection, following the gear up landing approx. 175 hrs previous to the accident. During this inspection the fuel manifold valve and fuel pipes were dismantled and reinstalled. Presumably the leakage started gradually. Initially the extent of the leakage might have been so minor that the fuel had vaporized without being set alight. The blue staining of the cylinders conveys that there have been pools of fuel in the area, and that significant leakage undoubtedly occurred during the flight from Germany to Norway. On start-up from Rørvik Airport Ryum, the leakage continued and it is most probable that the fire started just before take-off. The pilot did not observe the fire before he hit the large stones at the end of the runway, i.e. shortly before the aircraft continued out into the sea. This is explained by the engine cowling being unusually tight fitted on this liquid-cooled engine aircraft. The flames could not be seen before the engine cowling was struck sideways in the crash. The sea extinguished the fire immediately.
Final Report:

Crash of a De Havilland DHC-6 Twin Otter 300 in Namsos: 6 killed

Date & Time: Oct 27, 1993 at 1916 LT
Operator:
Registration:
LN-BNM
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Trondheim - Namsos
MSN:
408
YOM:
1974
Flight number:
WF744
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
2
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
17
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
6
Captain / Total flying hours:
4835
Captain / Total hours on type:
1998.00
Copilot / Total flying hours:
6354
Copilot / Total hours on type:
1365
Aircraft flight hours:
40453
Circumstances:
On approach to Namsos Airport by night, the crew encountered poor visibility due to rain falls. In below weather minima, the crew descended below the minimum safe altitude until the aircraft struck the ground and crashed in a swampy area located about 6 km short of runway. The aircraft was destroyed on impact and six occupants including both pilots were killed. All 13 other occupants were injured.
Probable cause:
The accident was the consequence of a controlled flight into terrain. The following findings were reported:
- The company had failed to implement a standardized concept of aircraft operation that the pilots fully respected and lived by;
- The approach briefing was not not fully implemented in accordance with the rules. There were deficiencies in:
- "Call outs" during the approach
- Descent rate (feet/min) during "FAF inbound"
- Timing "outbound" from the IAF and the time from FAF to MAPt;
- The crew did not execute the "base turn" at the scheduled time, with the consequence that the plane ended up about 14 NM from the airport;
- The Pilot Flying ended the approach with reference to aircraft instruments and continued on a visual approach in the dark without visual reference to the underlying terrain. During this part of the approach the aircraft's position was not positively checked using any available navigational aids;
- Both crew members had in all likelihood most of the attention out of the cockpit at the airport after the Pilot Not Flying announced that he had it in sight;
- The crew was never aware of how close they were the underlying terrain;
- The last part of the descent from about 500 feet indicated altitude to 392 feet can be caused by inattention to the fact that the plane may have been a little out of trim after the descent;
- Crew Cooperation during the approach was not in accordance with with the CRM concept and seems to have ceased completely after the Pilot Not Flying called "field in sight";
- Before the accident the company had not succeeded well enough with the introduction of standardization and internal control/quality assurance. This was essentially because the management had not placed enough emphasis on awareness and motivate employees;
- The self-control system described in the airline operations manual and the parts of the quality system, was not incorporated in the organization and served as poor safety governing elements;
- Neither the Norwegian CAA nor the company had defined what visual reference to terrain is, what sufficient visual references are and what the references must be in relation to a moving aircraft.
Final Report:

Crash of a Consolidated B-24D-70-CO Liberator in Snåsa: 12 killed

Date & Time: Apr 6, 1945
Operator:
Registration:
42-40549
Flight Phase:
Flight Type:
Survivors:
No
Site:
MSN:
1626
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
12
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
0
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
12
Circumstances:
Enroute, the heavy bomber hit the slope of Mt Plukkutjonnfjell located in the Snåsa district. The aircraft was destroyed and all 12 crew members were killed.
Crew (492nd BG):
F/O Arthur H. Barbknecht,
2nd Lt Richard A. Bosch,
1st Lt Leon Dibble Jr.,
1st Lt William H. Hudson,
Sgt Gilbert L. Magruder,
Sgt Angelo Santini,
Sgt Fayette Shelledy,
Sgt Jack H. Spyker.
NORSO Group Members:
1st Lt Baine E. Jones,
Cpl Robert N. Anderson,
Sgt Knut J. Falck,
Tec Bernard N. Iversen.

Crash of a Junkers JU.52/3m5eSee in Risvika: 1 killed

Date & Time: Nov 2, 1941
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
DR+WH
Flight Phase:
Flight Type:
Survivors:
Yes
Schedule:
Trondheim – Bodø
MSN:
6940
YOM:
1940
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
4
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
13
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
1
Circumstances:
En route from Trondheim to Bodø, the three engine floatplane crashed in unknown circumstances in a valley located in Risvika, 7 km west of Salsbruket. The airplane was destroyed and all 17 occupants were wounded. Two days later, a passenger died from injuries sustained.
Crew (1./KGr zbV.108):
Lt Heinz Amberger,
Ofw Eric Schulz,
Fw Eduard Gröner,
Uffz Wilhelm Steinhauer.

Crash of a Hansa Brandenburg W.33 in Rørvik: 2 killed

Date & Time: Jul 22, 1922
Type of aircraft:
Operator:
Registration:
N.21
Flight Phase:
Survivors:
No
MSN:
7
YOM:
1922
Country:
Region:
Crew on board:
1
Crew fatalities:
Pax on board:
1
Pax fatalities:
Other fatalities:
Total fatalities:
2
Circumstances:
The aircraft was performing a regional flight when it crashed in unknown circumstances in the Namsdalen Valley located near Rørvik. Both occupants were killed. The aircraft was named 'Tiger'.